Written, Produced & Created by Chad James.

Episode 318 - In this episode, we delve into the shocking conclusion of the Lawyer X scandal that sent shockwaves through Victoria's justice system. Brace yourself for a wild ride filled with deceit, conflicts of interest, and corruption that rocked the very foundations of the criminal justice system. But before we unravel the latest twist, we rewind and shed some light on the central figure of this scandal, Nicola Gobbo, also known as Lawyer X. We then shift our focus to New South Wales, where the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) drops a bombshell report. Former premier Gladys Berejiklian finds herself entangled in "serious corrupt conduct" in connection to government grants, all while keeping her relationship with then Wagga Wagga MP Daryl Maguire under wraps. The report, delivered to parliament almost two years after Berejiklian's resignation, exposes a conflict of interest that could have influenced her public duty. And finally, prepare for an explosive revelation as we uncover the largest tax fraud scam in Australian history. Through a combination of damning text messages, secret recordings, and a hidden camera, the Australian Federal Police unveil a sophisticated $105 million tax fraud scheme. We dive into the details, exploring the 28,000 pages of documents and 70 hours of intercepted phone, video, and audio material that have now been brought to light outside the courtroom. Thanks to a riveting Four Corners investigation that aired last Monday night, listeners will experience this evidence firsthand. Join us as we navigate the treacherous depths of these scandals, unveiling the truth behind the Lawyer X debacle, exposing corruption in the highest echelons of political power, and witnessing the groundbreaking evidence that brought down a massive tax fraud operation. This is a podcast episode you won't want to miss. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠Instagram⁠, ⁠TikTok⁠ & ⁠YouTube⁠. Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (4:25) Lawyer X Background (14:45) How it Unfolded (28:36) Rage Quit! (34:37) Daniel Andrews' Answer (44:27) Victoria's Gangland Problem (55:24) Police Powers (59:30) Gladys v ICAC (1:03:33) Is Gladys OK? (1:10:52) The Phone Taps (1:13:16) ATO Scam Uncovered (1:26:04) The Bikies Won (1:32:25) Final Thoughts Written, Produced and Created by Chad James

Episode 317 - In this episode, we delve into a heated legal dispute involving independent MP Alex Greenwich and the controversial leader of NSW One Nation, Mark Latham. Greenwich has taken legal action against Latham, seeking aggravated damages on grounds of defamation. The incident stems from a tweet in which Latham made graphic and homophobic accusations, targeting Greenwich and his alleged involvement in what he described as "disgusting" sexual activities. The tweet was posted by Mr Latham in March as a response to an earlier remark made by Mr Greenwich, who had referred to Latham as a "disgusting human being." This comment was made in the aftermath of an incident where LGBTQI protesters were assaulted outside a public forum where Latham was speaking. Although Latham did delete the tweet shortly after, he staunchly refused to offer an apology. This refusal has escalated the matter, leading to a legal battle between the two prominent figures. Join us as we explore the nuances of this high-profile case, analysing the legal ramifications and potential implications for both individuals involved. WARNING: Sensitive Content Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, Instagram, TikTok & YouTube. Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (3:28) Chess Game (6:13) Does Greenwich Have a Case? (9:40) Hate Speech (12:27) Is it Defamation? (20:35) Is it a Crime? (28:41) Will Latham Settle? Written, Produced and Created by Chad James

Episode 316 - In this episode we delve into a dramatic sequence of events that unfolded in the Senate. Yesterday, Senator Thorpe utilised parliamentary privilege to make serious accusations against Liberal Senator David Van, alleging sexual harassment and assault. Senator Van promptly denied the allegations, but later Senator Thorpe withdrew her claims. Today, in a continuation of her Senate address, Senator Thorpe shared further details of unsettling encounters with unnamed men in the parliamentary environment that left her feeling unsafe. Responding to Senator Thorpe's remarks from the previous night Opposition Leader, Peter Dutton, revealed that another allegation had been brought to his attention. Following a meeting with Senator Van, Mr. Dutton advised him that he would no longer be a member of the Liberal Party Room. Join us as we explore the ramifications of these grave allegations, their impact on the political landscape, and the consequences for Senator Van's future within the party. Guest: Niko is a Sydney-based lawyer, software engineer & regular contributor on Chad Theory Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (2:25) What Happened? (5:32) The Allegations (7:42) Harassment or Assault? (12:37) Is Lidia Thorpe Fit for Parliament? (15:36) Checkmate! (18:22) Peter Dutton's Response (23:58) Toxic Politics (29:07) Elite Privileges (32:56) Predictions... Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 315 - Finance Minster, Katy Gallagher, may have misled Parliament on a crucial fact regarding her knowledge of the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins. During a Senate estimates hearing in 2021, Gallagher claimed she had no prior knowledge of the incident before Brittany Higgins made her shocking claims public in February 2021. However, it appears that Gallagher's own words contradict her statement to the Senate committee. The truth came to light when Liberal cabinet minister Linda Reynolds, at the time, accused Gallagher of being aware of the allegations two weeks before they were aired on The Project on 15 Feb 2021. In response, Gallagher vehemently denied any knowledge, stating, "No one had any knowledge. How dare you." But recent revelations suggest otherwise. Join Chad & Niko for up to date commentary on the Brittany Higgins, Dave sharaz & Lisa Wilkinson leaks, and what they mean for Bruce Lehrmann's upcoming defamation trial in the Federal Court. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (2:36) Did Katy Gallagher Lie? (9:46) Labor, Lies & More Lies... (17:37) Do the Leaks Help Bruce Lehrmann? (31:23) Brittany Higgins' Big Mistake (35:52) What Leaks are Next? Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 314 - Chad & Niko are joined by Sydney Lawyer, Rowena, to uncover the gripping story of Australia's most decorated living soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith, who recently suffered a devastating loss in the Federal Court after a five-year civil case against three newspapers and three journalists. In 2018, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, and The Canberra Times published articles containing allegations of unlawful killings in Afghanistan, SAS bullying, and domestic violence. The war veteran denied all wrongdoing and lodged 14 defamatory claims against the stories. The most serious accusations, brought forward by publisher Nine Entertainment, implicated the soldier in six unlawful killings. Testimonies from numerous SAS soldiers, offering conflicting accounts of key missions, left the judge with a stark choice between irreconcilable narratives. Join us as we dissect the aftermath of this high-stakes trial. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (2:45) Why so Expensive? (14:30) The Trial (21:28) No Reputation Left... (25:27) Secret Witnesses (33:31) Substantial vs Contextual Truth (36:42) Is he a War Criminal? (45:15) The Truth vs Public Interest (51:36) Could he Appeal? (1:00:27) Who Made BRS? (1:08:42) The Media's Fail... (1:13:47) Criminal Proceedings Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 313 - Chad, Niko & Liv dive into the latest developments surrounding the allegations made by Brittany Higgins against former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann. In a recent interview on 7NEWS Spotlight, Lehrmann vehemently denied the accusations of rape, providing his own version of events. This marked Lehrmann's first television appearance since Ms Higgins made her allegations public, making it a significant moment for many Australians seeking to hear his side of the story. Meanwhile, the controversial leaking of private material related to Brittany Higgins has made its way into Bruce Lehrmann's Federal Court proceedings, where the court heard about the publication of an audio recording featuring Higgins, her partner David Sharaz, and two Network 10 journalists, including Lisa Wilkinson, along with text messages sent by Higgins to various parties. Despite multiple outlets publishing this material over several weeks, the identity of the source remains unclear, adding a layer of intrigue to the ongoing saga. Furthermore, the Coalition is putting pressure on Finance Minister, Katy Gallagher, seeking an explanation for her testimony during Senate estimates. Text messages between Brittany Higgins and her partner, David Sharaz, have been released, suggesting contact with Gallagher days before the story broke, raising questions about the credibility of her evidence before the Senate Committee. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (1:14) Lehrmann's Channel 7 Interview (12:24) I Have Questions... (19:47) The Higgins, Sharaz & Wilkinson Leak (23:18) Federal Court Update (31:55) Labor's Mean Girls (37:37) Brittany Higgins' Payout (43:47) Lehrmann v News Corp Settles Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 312 - Chad & Liv delve into the compelling story of Kathleen Folbigg, who recently made headlines after being pardoned and released from prison following two decades behind bars. Convicted in 2003 for the deaths of her four children, Folbigg has steadfastly maintained her innocence throughout her trial and imprisonment. Join us as we explore the shocking turn of events that led to her release. We'll examine the decision of New South Wales attorney general, Michael Daley, who based on the summary findings of an inquiry conducted by former state chief justice Thomas Bathurst, recommended that Folbigg be unconditionally pardoned and set free. Through in-depth interviews and analysis, we'll uncover the reasons behind Bathurst's firm view of reasonable doubt regarding Folbigg's guilt for each offense she was originally tried for. What evidence or circumstances led to this dramatic reversal in the case? How did the public and legal community react to the decision? With expert perspectives and insights into the investigation, we'll navigate the complexities of the Kathleen Folbigg case. Tune in as we explore the impact of the decision on Folbigg's life, the justice system, and society as a whole. From the heart-wrenching loss of four children to the aftermath of her release, this podcast sheds light on a case that has divided opinions and challenged our notions of guilt and innocence. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Free at Last! (3:38) Pardoned, not Exonerated... (8:39) Craig Folbigg Hits Back (12:05) Follow the Science (18:15) Is Folbigg Innocent? (29:18) Was There Juror Misconduct? (33:46) Predictions Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 311 - Chad, Niko & Liv are joined by Gender Critical Feminist, Kylie, to examine a legal case that revolves around an Australian transgender woman, Roxy Tickle, who is taking legal action against a female-only social app called Giggle for Girls, along with its founder, Sally Grover. Ms Tickle alleges that she faced discrimination based on her gender identity when she was denied access to the app. Ms Tickle underwent gender affirming surgery in 2019 and is legally recognised as female on her birth certificate. The Giggle for Girls app is primarily designed for cisgender women but, interestingly, initially accepted Ms Tickle's application. This acceptance was determined by a third-party artificial intelligence system that analysed a selfie she submitted and identified her as a woman. However, Ms Tickle's access to the app was later revoked by Ms Grover herself, the founder of Giggle for Girls. Ms Grover justified her decision by stating that Ms Tickle was an "adult human male." As a result, Ms Tickle believes that she experienced discrimination based on her gender identity. What makes this case particularly intriguing is that it had previously been discontinued, but it will now be heard in court. The court will delve into the complexities of the situation, analysing whether the denial of access to the app was indeed an act of discrimination. This legal battle sheds light on important questions surrounding inclusivity, gender identity, the rights of transgender individuals and the rights of cisgender women. It will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications, not just within the realm of social apps, but for transgender and women's rights as a whole. Access the latest judgement for Tickle v Giggle For Girls Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 553 ⁠⁠here⁠⁠ Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) How did we get Here? (6:09) What Happened in Court? (19:45) Who's Winning? (28:44) I'm a Woman! (32:14) Sex v Gender (41:16) Constitutional Challenge (50:35) Predictions Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 310 - In this episode, Chad & Niko delve into a scandal that rocked the financial world and exposed the dubious practices of a renowned multinational consulting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). Join us as we uncover the story of Peter Collins, a former PwC adviser who became embroiled in a web of deceit that undermined the integrity of Australia's tax system. Back in 2015, Peter Collins, then the international tax chief at PwC's Australian affiliate, found himself in a position of influence. Tasked with assisting the Australian government in designing more robust multinational tax laws, Collins had access to highly sensitive information. However, instead of upholding his ethical obligations and maintaining confidentiality, he chose to betray the trust placed in him. Collins clandestinely leaked confidential details of the government's plans to PwC personnel both within Australia and overseas. Unbeknownst to the Australian government, this information was exploited by PwC to gain an unfair advantage. With advanced knowledge of impending tax changes, PwC was able to provide early warnings to over a dozen American companies, securing lucrative contracts and potentially denying Australia significant tax revenues. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) What Happened? (5:23) The Scheme (11:54) PwC's Secret... (16:23) Who Knew What & When? (22:11) Secret Government (28:37) White Collar Criminals (35:37) Lock 'em up! (39:24) The Cover up... (44:56) Final Thoughts Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 309 - Justice Joshua Wilson, a federal and family court justice, had prepared a speech for an international conference where he intended to argue that progressive governments appoint diverse judges without considering their merit. However, after the speech was uploaded on the court's website, Chief Justice William Alstergren discovered its contents and ordered its removal. As a result, Justice Wilson was compelled to apologise to his colleagues and was prohibited from attending the conference scheduled for September at the International Association of Judges annual general meeting in Taiwan. Chad, Niko & Kylie discuss how this judge was silenced and why. Read The Guardian article ⁠here⁠ Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (4:37) The Judge's Speech (11:47) Solicitor vs Barrister (16:00) Political Favours... (22:00) Woke vs Elitist Judges (31:14) What do Women Want? (46:20) Class Warfare in the Judiciary (59:25) Hush Money Payments Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 308 - Secret payments, out of court settlements, numerous breaches of media codes and even their own legislated charter. ABC began as a solution to our corrupted media landscape, only to become the white elephant of public discourse. What follows is a detailed analysis of a legal dispute between an accused rapist, Bruce Lehrmann, and our ABC, over the broadcasting of Brittany Higgins’ allegations at the National Press Club in February of 2022. Mr. Lehrmann vehemently denies the allegations, and has never been convicted of a crime. He brought defamation proceedings against Network Ten and News Corp, which, at this stage, will go to trial in November. But his case against the ABC is different. Why? And how do we reconcile the ABC’s role as public interest journalist in chief with their repeated failings in areas that they purport to be experts? And, most importantly, if they can’t fulfil their essential mandate, why does the taxpayer continue footing their one billion dollar annual bill? Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (6:48) This time, it's different... (9:23) New defamation laws (17:53) Bruce Lehrmann strikes back (22:12) Serious harm & damages (25:50) Did ABC prejudice the jury? (29:04) ABC's hits back (33:09) The "ABC narrative" (45:39) Grace Tame v Brittany Higgins (54:59) Who will win this battle? (1:00:41) Stan Grant (1:08:23) Do we need the ABC? (1:14:36) ABC's moral hazard (1:17:37) Final Thoughts Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 307 - Chad & Niko discuss the sensational downfall of the ACT’s most senior prosecutor, Shane Drumgold. We’ll give you a rundown of the key testimony so far at the public hearings, and play for you some snippets from the hearings that we believe you should know about - they include Drumgold walking back his claims of a government conspiracy, Lisa Wilkinson’s lawyer grilling Shane Drumgold over his failings as a chief prosecutor and failing to stop Wilkinson from making her now infamous Logies acceptance speech, and we also play for you excerpts from the inquiry’s chairman, Walter Sofronoff KC, where he outlines his thinking so far and how he sees things going. To start off with, we take a quick step back and refresh our memories as to how this all started, and why it has become a matter of such intense public interest. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (2:28) Drumgold Raises the Alarm (6:45) Drumgold's Sensational Backflip (22:12) Lisa Wilkinson's Speech (43:18) Complainant vs Victim (1:03:15) Should Drumgold Resign? (1:06:36) Hiding in Plain Sight! Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 306 - Australian woman, Kathleen Folbigg, has been in prison for 20 years. She was convicted of killing her four children over a 10 year period in the 90s, and received a 40 year prison sentence in 2003 after her husband found her diaries and handed them over to police, which contained what prosecutors believed to be a confession. Folbigg's trial lasted seven weeks, and it took the jury just 8 hours to convict her of three counts of murder, and one of manslaughter. The prosecution alleged she murdered all four of her children by smothering them during periods of frustration. Rather than relying on scientific and forensic evidence to convict Folbigg, the case relied on the improbability of all four children dying of natural causes - as the infamous Meadow's law maxim goes, “One sudden infant death is a tragedy, two is suspicious and three is murder, until proven otherwise." The defence argued there was no physical evidence linking the mother to murders - the evidence, according to them, was entirely circumstantial. In fact there was very little consensus among the scientific experts who testified at the trial in 2003. Fast forward to 2018 - the New South Wales attorney general calls for an inquiry into the convictions to “ensure public confidence in the administration of justice”. Modern science offers alternative explanations for the deaths of Folbigg’s four children. New research suggests that all four of her kids carried genetic mutations that point to deaths by natural causes. A second public inquiry into Folbigg’s convictions has just finished - and the conclusion of this inquiry is that there is reasonable doubt as to Folbigg’s guilt. So what happens now? Is Kathleen Folbigg a murderer, or was her family just incredibly unlucky? What are the chances of all four children from the same family, all dying from natural causes? And if she isn’t guilty of killing them, why has she been in prison for 20 years? This could be one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in Australian history. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (3:39) The Story So Far... (9:23) The Folbigg Inquiries (14:06) Is Kathleen Folbigg a Murderer? (28:20) Meadow's Law (34:58) What Happens Now? (38:41) The Truth About Our Courts...  (55:42) Final Thoughts Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 305 (FULL) - Independent MP, Monique Ryan, and her former Chief of Staff, Sally Rugg, have reached a settlement of $100k, to be fully funded by the taxpayer, which brings Sally Rugg’s dispute over her working conditions to an end. She had launched legal action against the Commonwealth and Monique Ryan over what she claimed was an unfair dismissal after she refused to work unreasonable additional hours in her role as chief of staff to the MP. Chad & Niko take you through the details of this settlement in a legal dispute that was meant to be the first legal challenge to the idea of "reasonable additional hours", and explain the conflicts of interest at play. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (1:54) The Settlement (6:18) Why Did They Settle? (13:24) Conflicts of Interest (23:12) The Solution... Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 304 (FULL) - Roxanne Tickle is suing the app Giggle for Girls and its creator, Sally Grover. Roxy is a transgender woman who claims Sall Grover deliberately removed her from the app because she looked like a man, and wasn’t eligible to join the Giggle app, which was supposedly exclusively for females. Roxy initially made a complaint through the Human Rights Commission, but the matter was terminated due to a low prospect of conciliation. Roxy then took the matter to the federal court, only to discontinue her legal claim shortly thereafter. So, why is this back in court? What happened in between, and why is Roxy Tickle so adamant that she should be allowed onto the Giggle for Girls app? What does the law say about discrimination against transgender women? And, ultimately, are transgender women 'real women'? Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (2:24) The Story So Far... (9:39) Who is Roxy Tickle? (15:30) What is a Woman? (19:18) The Human Rights Commission (24:51) Tickle Goes to Court (29:12) Tickle v Giggle (36:24) The Law v Culture Wars (52:38) Courtroom Gossip Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 303 (FULL) - Bruce Lehrmann has overcome a legal hurdle in pursuing the media in the Federal Court over the publication of Brittany Higgins' claims - Justice Lee of the Federal Court has given Lehrmann the green light to proceed to trial. Chad explains exactly what this win means, and perhaps more importantly what it doesn’t mean, by taking you through the decision and making specific reference to Justice Lee’s judgement. NOTE: Bruce Lehrmann has always maintained his innocence and has never been convicted of a crime. However, Brittany Higgins maintains her allegations are true and correct. Access Justice Lee's Summary Judgement Here Access all published documents in Lehrmann v 'Media' Here Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (2:07) What This Win Is(n't) (7:34) Lehrmann's Text Messages (16:43) Mr. Korn's Legal Advice (20:17) Lehrmann's "Right to Silence" (31:08) Lehrmann v ABC (34:26) The Trial Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 302 (FULL) - Chad & Niko bring you the latest in this potentially historic lawsuit between Chief of Staff, Sally Rugg, and teal Independent MP, Monique Ryan. Now we have access to the inner machinations of the dispute - we can finally reveal to you the details of Sally Rugg’s legal argument, and how she intends to win her case against the government. Anthony Albanese is named several times, and is firmly in Rugg's cross-hairs. He could even be compelled to testify and give evidence if this case goes to trial. But, why? What does the Prime Minister have to do with a dispute within an Independent MP’s office? Why has he become a key target in Sally Rugg’s statement of claim? Subscriptions will be back in early May. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (2:02) The Story so Far... (11:05) What are Reasonable Hours? (26:20) Albo is Implicated (35:02) Albo's Defence (40:56) How This Plays Out Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 301 (FULL) - Join Chad, Niko & Liv for a weekly wrap up of the latest headlines in law and politics including: (0:00) Intro (1:48) Liberal Party Reshuffle (8:27) Solicitor General's Voice Advice (33:35) Labor's Jobseeker Snub (45:26) NSW Election Finalised (55:47) Fox News is Fake News (1:14:15) Looking Ahead...  Subscriptions will be back in early May. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 300 (FULL) - The highly anticipated review into the RBA was released this week - there were 51 recommendations, and the government has already committed to pushing through with most of them, in principle, if not all of them. Among the recommendations are a new Monetary Policy board, new committees, new executive positions and more collaboration with public and private sector stakeholders. Most of us would agree that the RBA is broken. It’s not fit for purpose. So, which of these recommendations, if any, address the RBA’s broken mechanism, and how do they propose to fix it? Chad & Niko assess the merits of these changes and, as usual, help you to read between the lines so you’re up to date and informed over and above the basic headlines. Subscriptions will be back in early May. Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating! Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (0:00) Intro (1:52) Context for Renewal (17:16) RBA's New Mandate (26:23) Will the RBA be Independent? (29:29) RBA's New Structure (34:17) Chad's Take (43:32) Will This Fix the Housing Crisis? Written and Created by Chad James